李岩. 也谈“静”的逻辑与“动”的逻辑的关系——基于“矛盾观”教学的思考[J]. 黄河水利职业技术学院学报, 2020, 32(2): 78-82. DOI: 10.13681/j.cnki.cn41-1282/tv.2020.02.019
    引用本文: 李岩. 也谈“静”的逻辑与“动”的逻辑的关系——基于“矛盾观”教学的思考[J]. 黄河水利职业技术学院学报, 2020, 32(2): 78-82. DOI: 10.13681/j.cnki.cn41-1282/tv.2020.02.019
    Li Yan. Research on Relations Between Logic of “Quietness” and Logic of “Movement”[J]. Journal of Yellow River Conservancy Technical Institute, 2020, 32(2): 78-82. DOI: 10.13681/j.cnki.cn41-1282/tv.2020.02.019
    Citation: Li Yan. Research on Relations Between Logic of “Quietness” and Logic of “Movement”[J]. Journal of Yellow River Conservancy Technical Institute, 2020, 32(2): 78-82. DOI: 10.13681/j.cnki.cn41-1282/tv.2020.02.019

    也谈“静”的逻辑与“动”的逻辑的关系——基于“矛盾观”教学的思考

    Research on Relations Between Logic of “Quietness” and Logic of “Movement”

    • 摘要: 被称为“静”的逻辑的形式逻辑与被称为“动”的逻辑的辩证逻辑,二者既对立又统一。虽然在研究对象、适用领域以及产生依据等方面有所差异,但二者之间密切相关、互为补充。“静”的逻辑是“动”的逻辑的前提和基础,“动”的逻辑是“静”的逻辑的动力和目的。形式逻辑作为“静”的逻辑,既不是形而上学的世界观,也不存在被辩证逻辑彻底否定的可能。青年学生要正确认识两种思维工具的重要性,自觉树立“动”“静”结合的思维方式。

       

      Abstract: The formal logic called the logic of “Quietness” and the dialectical logic called the logic of“Movement” are both antagonistic and unitary. Although there are differences in the research objects, applicable fields and basis of production, the two are closely related and complementary. “Quietness” logic is the premise and foundation of “Movement” logic, and “Movement” logic is the power and purpose of“Quietness” logic. Formal logic as a “Quietness” logic is neither a metaphysical worldview nor a possibility which thoroughly denied by dialectical logic. Young students must correctly understand the importance of the two thinking tools and consciously establish a “Movement” and “Quietness” way of thinking.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回